A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity
- Authors
- Warren S. McCullochWalter Pitts
- Journal
- Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02459570 →Countries where authors are citing A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity
This map shows the geographic impact of A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity
This network shows the impact of A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity.
About A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity
This paper, published in 1990, received 591 indexed citations . Written by Warren S. McCulloch and Walter Pitts covering the research area of Computational Theory and Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (182 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (77 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (73 citations). Published in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02459570.