Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: A new procedure
- Authors
- Susan E. Langmore
- Journal
- Dysphagia
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02414429 →Countries where authors are citing Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: A new procedure
This map shows the geographic impact of Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: A new procedure. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: A new procedure with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: A new procedure more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: A new procedure
This network shows the impact of Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: A new procedure. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: A new procedure.
About Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: A new procedure
This paper, published in 1988, received 603 indexed citations . Written by Susan E. Langmore covering the research area of Speech and Hearing, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Speech and Hearing (586 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (490 citations) and Surgery (370 citations). Published in Dysphagia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02414429.