Toward objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02408436 →Countries where authors are citing Toward objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS)
This map shows the geographic impact of Toward objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Toward objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toward objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Toward objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS)
This network shows the impact of Toward objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Toward objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS).
About Toward objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS)
This paper, published in 1980, received 1.8k indexed citations . Written by Eric Schopler, Robert J. Reichler, Robert F. DeVellis and Kenneth Daly covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (1.6k citations), Clinical Psychology (600 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (579 citations). Published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02408436.