International system of radiographic grading of vesicoureteric reflux
- Journal
- Pediatric Radiology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02388714 →Countries where authors are citing International system of radiographic grading of vesicoureteric reflux
This map shows the geographic impact of International system of radiographic grading of vesicoureteric reflux. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by International system of radiographic grading of vesicoureteric reflux with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International system of radiographic grading of vesicoureteric reflux more than expected).
Fields of papers citing International system of radiographic grading of vesicoureteric reflux
This network shows the impact of International system of radiographic grading of vesicoureteric reflux. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the International system of radiographic grading of vesicoureteric reflux.
About International system of radiographic grading of vesicoureteric reflux
This paper, published in 1985, received 898 indexed citations . Written by Robert L. Lebowitz, H Olbing, K. Parkkulainen, J. M. Smellie and Tytti Tamminen-Möbius covering the research area of Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Urology and Obstetrics and Gynecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (855 citations), Urology (728 citations) and Epidemiology (352 citations). Published in Pediatric Radiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02388714.