Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Polychoric Correlation Coefficient
- Authors
- Ulf Olsson
- Journal
- Psychometrika
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02296207 →Countries where authors are citing Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Polychoric Correlation Coefficient
This map shows the geographic impact of Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Polychoric Correlation Coefficient. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Polychoric Correlation Coefficient with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Polychoric Correlation Coefficient more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Polychoric Correlation Coefficient
This network shows the impact of Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Polychoric Correlation Coefficient. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Polychoric Correlation Coefficient.
About Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Polychoric Correlation Coefficient
This paper, published in 1979, received 842 indexed citations . Written by Ulf Olsson covering the research area of Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistics and Probability (172 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (123 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (113 citations). Published in Psychometrika.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02296207.