Application of Model-Selection Criteria to Some Problems in Multivariate Analysis
- Authors
- Stanley L. Sclove
- Journal
- Psychometrika
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02294360 →Countries where authors are citing Application of Model-Selection Criteria to Some Problems in Multivariate Analysis
This map shows the geographic impact of Application of Model-Selection Criteria to Some Problems in Multivariate Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Application of Model-Selection Criteria to Some Problems in Multivariate Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Application of Model-Selection Criteria to Some Problems in Multivariate Analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Application of Model-Selection Criteria to Some Problems in Multivariate Analysis
This network shows the impact of Application of Model-Selection Criteria to Some Problems in Multivariate Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Application of Model-Selection Criteria to Some Problems in Multivariate Analysis.
About Application of Model-Selection Criteria to Some Problems in Multivariate Analysis
This paper, published in 1987, received 2.0k indexed citations . Written by Stanley L. Sclove covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (746 citations), Social Psychology (361 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (321 citations). Published in Psychometrika.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02294360.