An Examination of Procedures for Determining the Number of Clusters in a Data Set

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 2.7k indexed citations. Written by Glenn W. Milligan and Martha C. Cooper covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (757 citations), Sociology and Political Science (245 citations) and Signal Processing (244 citations). Published in Psychometrika.

Countries where authors are citing An Examination of Procedures for Determining the Number of Clusters in a Data Set

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of An Examination of Procedures for Determining the Number of Clusters in a Data Set. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by An Examination of Procedures for Determining the Number of Clusters in a Data Set with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites An Examination of Procedures for Determining the Number of Clusters in a Data Set more than expected).

Fields of papers citing An Examination of Procedures for Determining the Number of Clusters in a Data Set

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of An Examination of Procedures for Determining the Number of Clusters in a Data Set. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the An Examination of Procedures for Determining the Number of Clusters in a Data Set.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02294245.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026