The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis
- Authors
- Henry F. Kaiser
- Journal
- Psychometrika
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02289233 →Countries where authors are citing The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis
This map shows the geographic impact of The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis
This network shows the impact of The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis.
About The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis
This paper, published in 1958, received 5.7k indexed citations . Written by Henry F. Kaiser. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (493 citations), Sociology and Political Science (451 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (437 citations). Published in Psychometrika.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02289233.