Time-Limit Tests: Estimating their Reliability and Degree of Speeding
- Journal
- Psychometrika
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02289113 →Countries where authors are citing Time-Limit Tests: Estimating their Reliability and Degree of Speeding
This map shows the geographic impact of Time-Limit Tests: Estimating their Reliability and Degree of Speeding. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Time-Limit Tests: Estimating their Reliability and Degree of Speeding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Time-Limit Tests: Estimating their Reliability and Degree of Speeding more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Time-Limit Tests: Estimating their Reliability and Degree of Speeding
This network shows the impact of Time-Limit Tests: Estimating their Reliability and Degree of Speeding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Time-Limit Tests: Estimating their Reliability and Degree of Speeding.
About Time-Limit Tests: Estimating their Reliability and Degree of Speeding
This paper, published in 1951, received 613 indexed citations . Written by Lee J. Cronbach and Willard G. Warrington covering the research area of Statistics and Probability and Management Science and Operations Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (113 citations), Social Psychology (90 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (72 citations). Published in Psychometrika.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02289113.