Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 561 indexed citations. Written by Robert H. Gardner, Bruce T. Milne and Robert V. O’Neill covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (345 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (300 citations) and Ecology (275 citations). Published in Landscape Ecology.

Countries where authors are citing Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02275262.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026