Dropouts from higher education: An interdisciplinary review and synthesis
- Authors
- William G. Spady
- Journal
- Interchange
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02214313 →Countries where authors are citing Dropouts from higher education: An interdisciplinary review and synthesis
This map shows the geographic impact of Dropouts from higher education: An interdisciplinary review and synthesis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dropouts from higher education: An interdisciplinary review and synthesis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dropouts from higher education: An interdisciplinary review and synthesis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Dropouts from higher education: An interdisciplinary review and synthesis
This network shows the impact of Dropouts from higher education: An interdisciplinary review and synthesis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Dropouts from higher education: An interdisciplinary review and synthesis.
About Dropouts from higher education: An interdisciplinary review and synthesis
This paper, published in 1970, received 778 indexed citations . Written by William G. Spady covering the research area of Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (671 citations), Social Psychology (129 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (90 citations). Published in Interchange.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02214313.