Validation of a self-administered instrument to assess stage of adolescent development
- Authors
- Naomi M. MorrisJ. Richard Udry
- Journal
- Journal of Youth and Adolescence
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02088471 →Countries where authors are citing Validation of a self-administered instrument to assess stage of adolescent development
This map shows the geographic impact of Validation of a self-administered instrument to assess stage of adolescent development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Validation of a self-administered instrument to assess stage of adolescent development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Validation of a self-administered instrument to assess stage of adolescent development more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Validation of a self-administered instrument to assess stage of adolescent development
This network shows the impact of Validation of a self-administered instrument to assess stage of adolescent development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Validation of a self-administered instrument to assess stage of adolescent development.
About Validation of a self-administered instrument to assess stage of adolescent development
This paper, published in 1980, received 828 indexed citations . Written by Naomi M. Morris and J. Richard Udry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (223 citations), Clinical Psychology (203 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (130 citations). Published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02088471.