A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients
- Journal
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02056950 →Countries where authors are citing A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients
This map shows the geographic impact of A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients
This network shows the impact of A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients.
About A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients
This paper, published in 1996, received 929 indexed citations . Written by Feran Agachan, Teng Chen, Johann Pfeifer, Petachia Reissman and Steven D. Wexner covering the research area of Gastroenterology, Rheumatology and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (644 citations), Rheumatology (538 citations) and Gastroenterology (414 citations). Published in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02056950.