Proportionate progress: A notion of fairness in resource allocation

508 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1996, received 508 indexed citations. Written by Sanjoy Baruah, Nathann Cohen, C. Gregory Plaxton and Donald Varvel covering the research area of Hardware and Architecture and Computational Theory and Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Hardware and Architecture (458 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (336 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (88 citations). Published in Algorithmica.

Countries where authors are citing Proportionate progress: A notion of fairness in resource allocation

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Proportionate progress: A notion of fairness in resource allocation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Proportionate progress: A notion of fairness in resource allocation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Proportionate progress: A notion of fairness in resource allocation more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Proportionate progress: A notion of fairness in resource allocation

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Proportionate progress: A notion of fairness in resource allocation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Proportionate progress: A notion of fairness in resource allocation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01940883.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026