Integrable Hamiltonian systems and interactions through quadratic constraints
- Authors
- K. Pohlmeyer
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf01609119 →Countries where authors are citing Integrable Hamiltonian systems and interactions through quadratic constraints
This map shows the geographic impact of Integrable Hamiltonian systems and interactions through quadratic constraints. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Integrable Hamiltonian systems and interactions through quadratic constraints with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Integrable Hamiltonian systems and interactions through quadratic constraints more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Integrable Hamiltonian systems and interactions through quadratic constraints
This network shows the impact of Integrable Hamiltonian systems and interactions through quadratic constraints. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Integrable Hamiltonian systems and interactions through quadratic constraints.
About Integrable Hamiltonian systems and interactions through quadratic constraints
This paper, published in 1976, received 595 indexed citations . Written by K. Pohlmeyer covering the research area of Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (473 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (339 citations) and Geometry and Topology (184 citations). Published in Communications in Mathematical Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01609119.