Review and extension of compliance information for common crack growth specimens
- Authors
- Ashok SaxenaS. J. Hudak
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf01390468 →Countries where authors are citing Review and extension of compliance information for common crack growth specimens
This map shows the geographic impact of Review and extension of compliance information for common crack growth specimens. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Review and extension of compliance information for common crack growth specimens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review and extension of compliance information for common crack growth specimens more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Review and extension of compliance information for common crack growth specimens
This network shows the impact of Review and extension of compliance information for common crack growth specimens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Review and extension of compliance information for common crack growth specimens.
About Review and extension of compliance information for common crack growth specimens
This paper, published in 1978, received 375 indexed citations . Written by Ashok Saxena and S. J. Hudak covering the research area of Mechanics of Materials and Mechanical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Mechanics of Materials (282 citations), Mechanical Engineering (222 citations) and Materials Chemistry (112 citations). Published in International Journal of Fracture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01390468.