QMR: a quasi-minimal residual method for non-Hermitian linear systems
- Authors
- Roland W. Freund
- Journal
- Numerische Mathematik
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf01385726 →Countries where authors are citing QMR: a quasi-minimal residual method for non-Hermitian linear systems
This map shows the geographic impact of QMR: a quasi-minimal residual method for non-Hermitian linear systems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by QMR: a quasi-minimal residual method for non-Hermitian linear systems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites QMR: a quasi-minimal residual method for non-Hermitian linear systems more than expected).
Fields of papers citing QMR: a quasi-minimal residual method for non-Hermitian linear systems
This network shows the impact of QMR: a quasi-minimal residual method for non-Hermitian linear systems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the QMR: a quasi-minimal residual method for non-Hermitian linear systems.
About QMR: a quasi-minimal residual method for non-Hermitian linear systems
This paper, published in 1991, received 679 indexed citations . Written by Roland W. Freund covering the research area of Numerical Analysis, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computational Theory and Mathematics (425 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (322 citations) and Numerical Analysis (236 citations). Published in Numerische Mathematik.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01385726.