Classical conditioning and retention in normal and mutantDrosophila melanogaster

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 927 indexed citations. Written by Tim Tully and William G. Quinn covering the research area of Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (770 citations), Genetics (299 citations) and Molecular Biology (220 citations). Published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

Countries where authors are citing Classical conditioning and retention in normal and mutantDrosophila melanogaster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Classical conditioning and retention in normal and mutantDrosophila melanogaster. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Classical conditioning and retention in normal and mutantDrosophila melanogaster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Classical conditioning and retention in normal and mutantDrosophila melanogaster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Classical conditioning and retention in normal and mutantDrosophila melanogaster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Classical conditioning and retention in normal and mutantDrosophila melanogaster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Classical conditioning and retention in normal and mutantDrosophila melanogaster.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01350033.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026