The hierarchical factor structure of the coping strategies inventory
- Journal
- Cognitive Therapy and Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf01173478 →Countries where authors are citing The hierarchical factor structure of the coping strategies inventory
This map shows the geographic impact of The hierarchical factor structure of the coping strategies inventory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The hierarchical factor structure of the coping strategies inventory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The hierarchical factor structure of the coping strategies inventory more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The hierarchical factor structure of the coping strategies inventory
This network shows the impact of The hierarchical factor structure of the coping strategies inventory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The hierarchical factor structure of the coping strategies inventory.
About The hierarchical factor structure of the coping strategies inventory
This paper, published in 1989, received 664 indexed citations . Written by David L. Tobin, Kenneth A. Holroyd, Russ V. Reynolds and Joan K. Wigal covering the research area of Speech and Hearing and Clinical Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (377 citations), Social Psychology (219 citations) and General Health Professions (143 citations). Published in Cognitive Therapy and Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01173478.