Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux: Incidence and precipitating factors
- Journal
- Digestive Diseases and Sciences
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf01071906 →Countries where authors are citing Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux: Incidence and precipitating factors
This map shows the geographic impact of Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux: Incidence and precipitating factors. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux: Incidence and precipitating factors with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux: Incidence and precipitating factors more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux: Incidence and precipitating factors
This network shows the impact of Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux: Incidence and precipitating factors. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux: Incidence and precipitating factors.
About Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux: Incidence and precipitating factors
This paper, published in 1976, received 721 indexed citations . Written by Otto T. Nebel, Michael F. Fornes and Donald O. Castell covering the research area of Gastroenterology and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Gastroenterology (642 citations), Surgery (628 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (85 citations). Published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf01071906.