Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind
- Journal
- Motivation and Emotion
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00992338 →Countries where authors are citing Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind
This map shows the geographic impact of Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind
This network shows the impact of Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind.
About Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind
This paper, published in 1987, received 726 indexed citations . Written by Heinz Heckhausen and Peter M. Gollwitzer covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience and General Decision Sciences. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Applied Psychology (367 citations), Social Psychology (260 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (171 citations). Published in Motivation and Emotion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00992338.