In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention
- Authors
- Julian Rappaport
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00896357 →Countries where authors are citing In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention
This map shows the geographic impact of In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention more than expected).
Fields of papers citing In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention
This network shows the impact of In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention.
About In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention
This paper, published in 1981, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Julian Rappaport covering the research area of General Health Professions, Social Psychology and General Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (777 citations), Clinical Psychology (312 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (167 citations). Published in American Journal of Community Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00896357.