Direct observation of frictional contacts: New insights for state-dependent properties
- Journal
- Pure and Applied Geophysics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00874332 →Countries where authors are citing Direct observation of frictional contacts: New insights for state-dependent properties
This map shows the geographic impact of Direct observation of frictional contacts: New insights for state-dependent properties. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Direct observation of frictional contacts: New insights for state-dependent properties with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Direct observation of frictional contacts: New insights for state-dependent properties more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Direct observation of frictional contacts: New insights for state-dependent properties
This network shows the impact of Direct observation of frictional contacts: New insights for state-dependent properties. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Direct observation of frictional contacts: New insights for state-dependent properties.
About Direct observation of frictional contacts: New insights for state-dependent properties
This paper, published in 1994, received 691 indexed citations . Written by James H. Dieterich and Brian D. Kilgore covering the research area of Geophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Geophysics (439 citations), Mechanics of Materials (325 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (132 citations). Published in Pure and Applied Geophysics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00874332.