The clinical use of mindfulness meditation for the self-regulation of chronic pain
- Journal
- Journal of Behavioral Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00845519 →Countries where authors are citing The clinical use of mindfulness meditation for the self-regulation of chronic pain
This map shows the geographic impact of The clinical use of mindfulness meditation for the self-regulation of chronic pain. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The clinical use of mindfulness meditation for the self-regulation of chronic pain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The clinical use of mindfulness meditation for the self-regulation of chronic pain more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The clinical use of mindfulness meditation for the self-regulation of chronic pain
This network shows the impact of The clinical use of mindfulness meditation for the self-regulation of chronic pain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The clinical use of mindfulness meditation for the self-regulation of chronic pain.
About The clinical use of mindfulness meditation for the self-regulation of chronic pain
This paper, published in 1985, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Jon Kabat‐Zinn, Leslie Lipworth and Robert Burney covering the research area of Clinical Psychology, Complementary and alternative medicine and Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (858 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (279 citations) and Social Psychology (238 citations). Published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00845519.