A dominant mutation inArabidopsis confers resistance to auxin, ethylene and abscisic acid

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 387 indexed citations. Written by Allison K. Wilson, F. Bryan Pickett, Jocelyn C. Turner and Mark Estelle covering the research area of Plant Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (381 citations), Molecular Biology (277 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (12 citations). Published in Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

Countries where authors are citing A dominant mutation inArabidopsis confers resistance to auxin, ethylene and abscisic acid

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A dominant mutation inArabidopsis confers resistance to auxin, ethylene and abscisic acid. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A dominant mutation inArabidopsis confers resistance to auxin, ethylene and abscisic acid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A dominant mutation inArabidopsis confers resistance to auxin, ethylene and abscisic acid more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A dominant mutation inArabidopsis confers resistance to auxin, ethylene and abscisic acid

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A dominant mutation inArabidopsis confers resistance to auxin, ethylene and abscisic acid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A dominant mutation inArabidopsis confers resistance to auxin, ethylene and abscisic acid.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00633843.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026