Synchronous spawnings of 105 scleractinian coral species on the Great Barrier Reef
- Journal
- Marine Biology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00428562 →Countries where authors are citing Synchronous spawnings of 105 scleractinian coral species on the Great Barrier Reef
This map shows the geographic impact of Synchronous spawnings of 105 scleractinian coral species on the Great Barrier Reef. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Synchronous spawnings of 105 scleractinian coral species on the Great Barrier Reef with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Synchronous spawnings of 105 scleractinian coral species on the Great Barrier Reef more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Synchronous spawnings of 105 scleractinian coral species on the Great Barrier Reef
This network shows the impact of Synchronous spawnings of 105 scleractinian coral species on the Great Barrier Reef. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Synchronous spawnings of 105 scleractinian coral species on the Great Barrier Reef.
About Synchronous spawnings of 105 scleractinian coral species on the Great Barrier Reef
This paper, published in 1986, received 609 indexed citations . Written by Russell C. Babcock, Peter L. Harrison, Andrew Heyward, James K. Oliver, Carden C. Wallace and Bette L. Willis covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology (543 citations), Global and Planetary Change (400 citations) and Oceanography (279 citations). Published in Marine Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00428562.