A chlorite solid solution geothermometer the Los Azufres (Mexico) geothermal system
- Authors
- Michel CathelineauDavid Nieva
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00413350 →Countries where authors are citing A chlorite solid solution geothermometer the Los Azufres (Mexico) geothermal system
This map shows the geographic impact of A chlorite solid solution geothermometer the Los Azufres (Mexico) geothermal system. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A chlorite solid solution geothermometer the Los Azufres (Mexico) geothermal system with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A chlorite solid solution geothermometer the Los Azufres (Mexico) geothermal system more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A chlorite solid solution geothermometer the Los Azufres (Mexico) geothermal system
This network shows the impact of A chlorite solid solution geothermometer the Los Azufres (Mexico) geothermal system. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A chlorite solid solution geothermometer the Los Azufres (Mexico) geothermal system.
About A chlorite solid solution geothermometer the Los Azufres (Mexico) geothermal system
This paper, published in 1985, received 563 indexed citations . Written by Michel Cathelineau and David Nieva covering the research area of Geophysics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Geophysics (523 citations), Artificial Intelligence (241 citations) and Biomaterials (132 citations). Published in Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00413350.