Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids
- Authors
- Friedrich WiddelNorbert Pfennig
- Journal
- Archives of Microbiology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00406470 →Countries where authors are citing Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids
This map shows the geographic impact of Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids
This network shows the impact of Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids.
About Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids
This paper, published in 1981, received 722 indexed citations . Written by Friedrich Widdel and Norbert Pfennig covering the research area of Building and Construction, Pollution and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (310 citations), Ecology (267 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (249 citations). Published in Archives of Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00406470.