Confined fission track lengths in apatite: a diagnostic tool for thermal history analysis

692 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1986, received 692 indexed citations. Written by Andrew Gleadow, Ian R. Duddy and J. F. Lovering covering the research area of Geophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Geophysics (637 citations), Artificial Intelligence (200 citations) and Atmospheric Science (141 citations). Published in Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology.

Countries where authors are citing Confined fission track lengths in apatite: a diagnostic tool for thermal history analysis

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Confined fission track lengths in apatite: a diagnostic tool for thermal history analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Confined fission track lengths in apatite: a diagnostic tool for thermal history analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Confined fission track lengths in apatite: a diagnostic tool for thermal history analysis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Confined fission track lengths in apatite: a diagnostic tool for thermal history analysis

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Confined fission track lengths in apatite: a diagnostic tool for thermal history analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Confined fission track lengths in apatite: a diagnostic tool for thermal history analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00376334.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026