Crystal size distribution (CSD) in rocks and the kinetics and dynamics of crystallization
- Authors
- B. D. Marsh
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00375362 →Countries where authors are citing Crystal size distribution (CSD) in rocks and the kinetics and dynamics of crystallization
This map shows the geographic impact of Crystal size distribution (CSD) in rocks and the kinetics and dynamics of crystallization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Crystal size distribution (CSD) in rocks and the kinetics and dynamics of crystallization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Crystal size distribution (CSD) in rocks and the kinetics and dynamics of crystallization more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Crystal size distribution (CSD) in rocks and the kinetics and dynamics of crystallization
This network shows the impact of Crystal size distribution (CSD) in rocks and the kinetics and dynamics of crystallization. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Crystal size distribution (CSD) in rocks and the kinetics and dynamics of crystallization.
About Crystal size distribution (CSD) in rocks and the kinetics and dynamics of crystallization
This paper, published in 1988, received 596 indexed citations . Written by B. D. Marsh covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Water Science and Technology and Atmospheric Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Geophysics (481 citations), Artificial Intelligence (157 citations) and Atmospheric Science (96 citations). Published in Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00375362.