Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale
- Journal
- Oecologia
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00329030 →Countries where authors are citing Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale
This map shows the geographic impact of Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale
This network shows the impact of Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale.
About Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale
This paper, published in 1996, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Josep G. Canadell, Robert B. Jackson, Harold A. Mooney, Osvaldo E. Sala and Ernst‐Detlef Schulze covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (799 citations), Soil Science (356 citations) and Water Science and Technology (320 citations). Published in Oecologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00329030.