Carbon isotope discrimination by plants follows latitudinal and altitudinal trends
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Oecologia
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00328400 →Countries where authors are citing Carbon isotope discrimination by plants follows latitudinal and altitudinal trends
This map shows the geographic impact of Carbon isotope discrimination by plants follows latitudinal and altitudinal trends. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carbon isotope discrimination by plants follows latitudinal and altitudinal trends with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carbon isotope discrimination by plants follows latitudinal and altitudinal trends more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Carbon isotope discrimination by plants follows latitudinal and altitudinal trends
This network shows the impact of Carbon isotope discrimination by plants follows latitudinal and altitudinal trends. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Carbon isotope discrimination by plants follows latitudinal and altitudinal trends.
About Carbon isotope discrimination by plants follows latitudinal and altitudinal trends
This paper, published in 1991, received 510 indexed citations . Written by Christian Körner, Graham D. Farquhar and Sherman Wong covering the research area of Plant Science, Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atmospheric Science (276 citations), Global and Planetary Change (254 citations), Ecology (180 citations), Plant Science (135 citations) and Paleontology (98 citations). Published in Oecologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00328400.