Measurement of the gravitational acceleration of an atom with a light-pulse atom interferometer

364 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1992, received 364 indexed citations. Written by Mark A. Kasevich and Steven Chu covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (329 citations), Artificial Intelligence (52 citations) and Ocean Engineering (45 citations). Published in Applied Physics B.

Countries where authors are citing Measurement of the gravitational acceleration of an atom with a light-pulse atom interferometer

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Measurement of the gravitational acceleration of an atom with a light-pulse atom interferometer. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Measurement of the gravitational acceleration of an atom with a light-pulse atom interferometer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Measurement of the gravitational acceleration of an atom with a light-pulse atom interferometer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Measurement of the gravitational acceleration of an atom with a light-pulse atom interferometer

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Measurement of the gravitational acceleration of an atom with a light-pulse atom interferometer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Measurement of the gravitational acceleration of an atom with a light-pulse atom interferometer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00325375.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026