Genesis of high Mg# andesites and the continental crust
- Authors
- P. B. Kelemen
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00311004 →Countries where authors are citing Genesis of high Mg# andesites and the continental crust
This map shows the geographic impact of Genesis of high Mg# andesites and the continental crust. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Genesis of high Mg# andesites and the continental crust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Genesis of high Mg# andesites and the continental crust more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Genesis of high Mg# andesites and the continental crust
This network shows the impact of Genesis of high Mg# andesites and the continental crust. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Genesis of high Mg# andesites and the continental crust.
About Genesis of high Mg# andesites and the continental crust
This paper, published in 1995, received 605 indexed citations . Written by P. B. Kelemen covering the research area of Geophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Geophysics (601 citations), Artificial Intelligence (199 citations) and Geochemistry and Petrology (67 citations). Published in Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00311004.