A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 1.3k indexed citations. Written by H. R. Wilson and J. D. Cowan covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (423 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (305 citations). Published in Kybernetik.

Countries where authors are citing A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00288786.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026