Abundance, variability and chromosomal location of microsatellites in wheat
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00288605 →Countries where authors are citing Abundance, variability and chromosomal location of microsatellites in wheat
This map shows the geographic impact of Abundance, variability and chromosomal location of microsatellites in wheat. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Abundance, variability and chromosomal location of microsatellites in wheat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Abundance, variability and chromosomal location of microsatellites in wheat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Abundance, variability and chromosomal location of microsatellites in wheat
This network shows the impact of Abundance, variability and chromosomal location of microsatellites in wheat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Abundance, variability and chromosomal location of microsatellites in wheat.
About Abundance, variability and chromosomal location of microsatellites in wheat
This paper, published in 1995, received 592 indexed citations . Written by Marion S. Röder, Jens Plaschke, Susanne König, Andreas Börner, Mark E. Sorrells, Steven D. Tanksley and Martin W. Ganal covering the research area of Plant Science and Genetics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (552 citations), Genetics (301 citations) and Molecular Biology (83 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00288605.