Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex

566 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1972, received 566 indexed citations. Written by Colin Blakemore covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (547 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (215 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (83 citations). Published in Experimental Brain Research.

Countries where authors are citing Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00234129.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026