A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures
- Journal
- Biological Cybernetics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00198091 →Countries where authors are citing A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures
This map shows the geographic impact of A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures
This network shows the impact of A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures.
About A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures
This paper, published in 1991, received 792 indexed citations . Written by Maciej Kamiński and Katarzyna J. Blinowska covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (669 citations), Signal Processing (100 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (93 citations). Published in Biological Cybernetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00198091.