The strength of adhesive joints using the theory of cracks
- Authors
- R. L. Salganik
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00186749 →Countries where authors are citing The strength of adhesive joints using the theory of cracks
This map shows the geographic impact of The strength of adhesive joints using the theory of cracks. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The strength of adhesive joints using the theory of cracks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The strength of adhesive joints using the theory of cracks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The strength of adhesive joints using the theory of cracks
This network shows the impact of The strength of adhesive joints using the theory of cracks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The strength of adhesive joints using the theory of cracks.
About The strength of adhesive joints using the theory of cracks
This paper, published in 1965, received 395 indexed citations . Written by R. L. Salganik covering the research area of Building and Construction and Mechanics of Materials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Mechanics of Materials (347 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (66 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (63 citations). Published in International Journal of Fracture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00186749.