A coronal hole and its identification as the source of a high velocity solar wind stream
- Journal
- Solar Physics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00150828 →Countries where authors are citing A coronal hole and its identification as the source of a high velocity solar wind stream
This map shows the geographic impact of A coronal hole and its identification as the source of a high velocity solar wind stream. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A coronal hole and its identification as the source of a high velocity solar wind stream with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A coronal hole and its identification as the source of a high velocity solar wind stream more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A coronal hole and its identification as the source of a high velocity solar wind stream
This network shows the impact of A coronal hole and its identification as the source of a high velocity solar wind stream. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A coronal hole and its identification as the source of a high velocity solar wind stream.
About A coronal hole and its identification as the source of a high velocity solar wind stream
This paper, published in 1973, received 553 indexed citations . Written by A. S. Krieger, A. F. Timothy and E. C. Roelof covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Astronomy and Astrophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (549 citations), Molecular Biology (185 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (59 citations). Published in Solar Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00150828.