Extreme events in a changing climate: Variability is more important than averages
- Authors
- Richard W. KatzBarbara G. Brown
- Journal
- Climatic Change
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00139728 →Countries where authors are citing Extreme events in a changing climate: Variability is more important than averages
This map shows the geographic impact of Extreme events in a changing climate: Variability is more important than averages. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Extreme events in a changing climate: Variability is more important than averages with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Extreme events in a changing climate: Variability is more important than averages more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Extreme events in a changing climate: Variability is more important than averages
This network shows the impact of Extreme events in a changing climate: Variability is more important than averages. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Extreme events in a changing climate: Variability is more important than averages.
About Extreme events in a changing climate: Variability is more important than averages
This paper, published in 1992, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Richard W. Katz and Barbara G. Brown covering the research area of Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (822 citations), Atmospheric Science (521 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (159 citations). Published in Climatic Change.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00139728.