Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design
- Authors
- Kjeld Schmidt
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00133655 →Countries where authors are citing Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design
This map shows the geographic impact of Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design
This network shows the impact of Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design.
About Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design
This paper, published in 1996, received 501 indexed citations . Written by Kjeld Schmidt covering the research area of Mechanical Engineering and Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (168 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (143 citations) and Information Systems (119 citations). Published in Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00133655.