Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter

715 indexed citations
published 1995

Countries where authors are citing Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter.

About Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter

This paper, published in 1995, received 715 indexed citations . Written by John Markwell, John C. Osterman and Jennifer L. Mitchell covering the research area of Plant Science, Ecology and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (540 citations), Ecology (273 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (135 citations). Published in Photosynthesis Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00032301.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026