A cDNA-based comparison of dehydration-induced proteins (dehydrins) in barley and corn
- Journal
- Plant Molecular Biology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00027338 →Countries where authors are citing A cDNA-based comparison of dehydration-induced proteins (dehydrins) in barley and corn
This map shows the geographic impact of A cDNA-based comparison of dehydration-induced proteins (dehydrins) in barley and corn. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A cDNA-based comparison of dehydration-induced proteins (dehydrins) in barley and corn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A cDNA-based comparison of dehydration-induced proteins (dehydrins) in barley and corn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A cDNA-based comparison of dehydration-induced proteins (dehydrins) in barley and corn
This network shows the impact of A cDNA-based comparison of dehydration-induced proteins (dehydrins) in barley and corn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A cDNA-based comparison of dehydration-induced proteins (dehydrins) in barley and corn.
About A cDNA-based comparison of dehydration-induced proteins (dehydrins) in barley and corn
This paper, published in 1989, received 420 indexed citations . Written by Timothy J. Close, Alexander A. Kortt and Peter M. Chandler covering the research area of Plant Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (376 citations), Molecular Biology (202 citations) and Genetics (23 citations). Published in Plant Molecular Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00027338.