Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science
- Journal
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/b97624 →Countries where authors are citing Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science
This map shows the geographic impact of Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science
This network shows the impact of Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science.
About Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science
This paper, published in 1992, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Heinz‐Otto Peitgen, Hartmut Jürgens and Dietmar Saupe. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (262 citations), Artificial Intelligence (195 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (177 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/b97624.