Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition

1.9k indexed citations
published 2003
Journal
Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1007/b97303 →

Countries where authors are citing Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition.

About Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition

This paper, published in 2003, received 1.9k indexed citations . Written by Davide Maltoni, Salil Prabhakar, Anil Jain and Dario Maio covering the research area of Signal Processing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Signal Processing (1.7k citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (1.2k citations) and Information Systems (826 citations). Published in Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/b97303.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026