Engineering Damage Mechanics: Ductile, Creep, Fatigue and Brittle Failures

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 826 indexed citations. Written by Jean Lemaitre and Rodrigue Desmorat covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Mechanical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Mechanics of Materials (583 citations), Mechanical Engineering (372 citations) and Materials Chemistry (247 citations). Published in SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1007/b138882 →

Countries where authors are citing Engineering Damage Mechanics: Ductile, Creep, Fatigue and Brittle Failures

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Engineering Damage Mechanics: Ductile, Creep, Fatigue and Brittle Failures. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Engineering Damage Mechanics: Ductile, Creep, Fatigue and Brittle Failures with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Engineering Damage Mechanics: Ductile, Creep, Fatigue and Brittle Failures more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Engineering Damage Mechanics: Ductile, Creep, Fatigue and Brittle Failures

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Engineering Damage Mechanics: Ductile, Creep, Fatigue and Brittle Failures. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Engineering Damage Mechanics: Ductile, Creep, Fatigue and Brittle Failures.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/b138882.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026