Repeatability and heritability of exploratory behaviour in great tits from the wild

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 634 indexed citations. Written by Niels J. Dingemanse, Christiaan Both, Piet J. Drent, Kees van Oers and Arie J. van Noordwijk covering the research area of Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (557 citations), Ecology (270 citations) and Social Psychology (118 citations). Published in Animal Behaviour.

Countries where authors are citing Repeatability and heritability of exploratory behaviour in great tits from the wild

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Repeatability and heritability of exploratory behaviour in great tits from the wild. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Repeatability and heritability of exploratory behaviour in great tits from the wild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Repeatability and heritability of exploratory behaviour in great tits from the wild more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Repeatability and heritability of exploratory behaviour in great tits from the wild

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Repeatability and heritability of exploratory behaviour in great tits from the wild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Repeatability and heritability of exploratory behaviour in great tits from the wild.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.2006.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026