Differential projections of the infralimbic and prelimbic cortex in the rat
- Authors
- Robert P. Vertes
- Journal
- Synapse
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/syn.10279 →Countries where authors are citing Differential projections of the infralimbic and prelimbic cortex in the rat
This map shows the geographic impact of Differential projections of the infralimbic and prelimbic cortex in the rat. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Differential projections of the infralimbic and prelimbic cortex in the rat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Differential projections of the infralimbic and prelimbic cortex in the rat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Differential projections of the infralimbic and prelimbic cortex in the rat
This network shows the impact of Differential projections of the infralimbic and prelimbic cortex in the rat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Differential projections of the infralimbic and prelimbic cortex in the rat.
About Differential projections of the infralimbic and prelimbic cortex in the rat
This paper, published in 2003, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Robert P. Vertes covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (757 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (727 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (372 citations). Published in Synapse.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/syn.10279.