Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation

273 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2018, received 273 indexed citations. Written by Michael Schomaker and Christian Heumann covering the research area of Statistics and Probability. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (47 citations), Statistics and Probability (43 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (33 citations). Published in Statistics in Medicine.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/sim.7654 →

Countries where authors are citing Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Bootstrap inference when using multiple imputation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/sim.7654.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026